Archived Content

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, please contact us to request an alternate format.

II. Principles of Law

(d) Teaching on a Casual or Substitute Basis

Claimants who are engaged in casual or substitute teaching during their qualifying period are entitled to receive benefits during the annual non-teaching periods.

Canada (A.G.) v. Lewis, June 19, 1990, F.C.J. No. 547 (F.C.A.) A-475-89 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal affirming CUB 17053 Appeal decision

The application of paragraph 33(2) (b) involves primarily a question of fact, and that the characterization of a teaching arrangement as "supply teaching" is relevant, but not necessarily determinative. It is theoretically possible that a teacher may have a period of employment as a supply teacher that is sufficiently regular that it cannot be said to be "employment on a casual or substitute basis."

Stephens v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources and Development), [2003] F.C.J. No. 1868 (F.C.A.) A-456-02 Judgments Of The Federal Court Of Appeal
Canada (A.G.) Blanchet, 2007 FCA 377 A-106-06

[  previous Previous page  |  table of contents  |  next Next page  ]