Claim Procedure
Archived Content
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, please contact us to request an alternate format.
Questions to Answer
- Has claimant made a claim for benefits (initial or continuing) in the form and manner directed by the Commission?
- Has claimant complied with the conditions or requirements to prove eligibility for benefits?
References
Act: sections 48 Employment Insurance Act, 49 Employment Insurance Act, 50 Employment Insurance Act
Regulations: section 26 Employment Insurance Regulations
Legal test
A person must make a claim for benefits in the form and manner directed by the Commission and must prove that:
- the person meets the requirements for receiving benefits; and
- no circumstances or conditions exist that have the effect of disentitling or disqualifying the person from receiving benefits. subsection 49(1) Employment Insurance Act
Onus of proof
Claimant must prove entitlement to benefit
Key Case Law
FALARDEAU
A-396-85 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: See Legal test.
PAQUETTE A-597-05 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Claimants are not compelled to submit a claimant's report for the waiting period.
KACHMAN A-757-85 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Claim for benefit during disentitlement or disqualification.
SMITH A-330-93 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: "A claim for benefits" vs "an initial claim for benefits"
CHOW A-1000-92 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Good cause for delay - returning report cards.
CHINOOK A-117-97 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal, HARBOUR A-541-85 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Need to prove conditions initially and ongoing
VILACA A-370-99 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: An information session can be considered as an "interview" for the purposes of subparagraph 27(1)(d)(i) Employment Insurance Act.
HERRERA A-397-99 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Proof of directing claimant to an interview required.
PAQUETTE A-597-05 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Claimants are not compelled to submit a claimant's report for the waiting period.
KACHMAN A-757-85 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Claim for benefit during disentitlement or disqualification.
SMITH A-330-93 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: "A claim for benefits" vs "an initial claim for benefits"
CHOW A-1000-92 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Good cause for delay - returning report cards.
CHINOOK A-117-97 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal, HARBOUR A-541-85 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Need to prove conditions initially and ongoing
VILACA A-370-99 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: An information session can be considered as an "interview" for the purposes of subparagraph 27(1)(d)(i) Employment Insurance Act.
HERRERA A-397-99 Judgment Of The Federal Court Of Appeal: Proof of directing claimant to an interview required.
Quick Reference
- What's New
- Board of Referees Jurisdiction
- Antedate
- Availability for Work
- Claim Procedure
- Delayed Appeal to the Board of Referees
- Earnings
- Labour Disputes
- Misconduct
- Out of Canada
- Penalties and Violations
- Qualifying Conditions
- Rate of Weekly Benefits
- Reconsideration of Claim
- Refusal of Employment
- Special Benefits
- Special Benefits/Compassionate Care
- Special Benefits/Maternity
- Special Benefits/Parental
- Special Benefits/Sickness
- Teachers
- Undeclared Earnings
- Week of Unemployment
- Voluntary Leaving